11-25-2010, 06:28 PM
(11-14-2010, 02:46 AM)M1A2Tanker link Wrote: Why should I not admit to it? It's not like the two are mutually exclusive.
I just never thought you to be into Star Trek is all.
Powered up, Blasters ready, lets do this!
Thread Rating:
|
Galvestooine
|
 I just never thought you to be into Star Trek is all. 
11-25-2010, 07:21 PM
Live long and prosper
Rebel parts... Imperial parts... All Made on Tatooine!!!
11-28-2010, 12:58 PM
wow wow wow this thread is making my head spin
 :o ??? :
There is no emotion:ÃÂ There is peace.ÃÂ There is no ignorance, there is knownledge.ÃÂ There is no passion, there is serenity.ÃÂ ÃÂ There is no chaos, there is harmony.ÃÂ There is no death, there is only the force-jedi code
12-04-2010, 12:54 AM
See? Even Holmes is a Trekkie.
But ya can't turn down the awesome power of a Star Destroyer or a squadron of Xwings. 
~§~
Tanker (tangk'er)n. 1. A dusty, crusty, grease-covered, dirty, sweaty, bright eyed, fuzzy faced, haircut-needing, beer-drinking, underrated, over-worked, underpaid, oversexed, little s%#* who can take a Tank and do more battlefield damage in ten minutes than a grunt squad can do all day. 
12-05-2010, 09:03 PM
why use a star destroyer when you have the death star? >
use the schwartz!
----------------- ![[Image: b00mer1.png]](http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sh/type/0/b00mer1.png)
12-06-2010, 04:09 PM
Because, as Tank would likely point out, instead of having to fire 2 torpedoes down a small vent into the central core of the DeathStar to take it out, using Trek tech, you could simply use the teleporter to place whatever type of explosive device you cared to use INSIDE the Death Star from a safe distance away, lol.
Beware my dark side......oh! Hi Dark.
12-08-2010, 10:34 AM
alright, good point...hmmm, how bout a super star destroyer then? ;D
use the schwartz!
-----------------
12-08-2010, 05:14 PM
Same method, placing one's choice of explosive device inside said SSD. Hmmmm, a little RED matter let loose inside the SSD would make for some interesting entertainment....AND clean up after itself too.... ;D
Beware my dark side......oh! Hi Dark.
12-08-2010, 07:17 PM
yeah but by doing that you run the risk of destroying yourselves as well...though i have to admit with phasers vs turbolasers and photon/quantum torpedoes vs proton torpedoes, with a phaser's range the trek ships would probably win, with being able to fire at the enemy ships from a much greater range, plus they could escape an imperial fleet easily at warp speed if they need to
use the schwartz!
-----------------
12-09-2010, 08:30 PM
The range of phasers and turbolasers is actually not as great as some think. There's notations that turbolasers could fire out to several million km at their max range, so it depends entirely on the source you go by.
That and apparently hyperspace is faster than warp drive. Faster than transwarp, since the GFFA and the Milky Way galaxies are the same, but you can get around the Star Wars galaxy within a few weeks. Honestly one could go forever with the whole 'trek vs wars' debate, but I care less. Both have their strong points and their weak points. And they're both a lot of fun.
~§~
Tanker (tangk'er)n. 1. A dusty, crusty, grease-covered, dirty, sweaty, bright eyed, fuzzy faced, haircut-needing, beer-drinking, underrated, over-worked, underpaid, oversexed, little s%#* who can take a Tank and do more battlefield damage in ten minutes than a grunt squad can do all day. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)